Alternative Collector Solutions
Learn about the ways the Quadra Technical Support & Services team is helping our clients solve mining recovery challenges and improve business processes.
Background
After many years of operating an open-pit copper-molybdenum mine in British Columbia, Canada, this mining organization announced the opening of a new standalone mineral processing plant. The flotation process used a blend of sodium isopropyl xanthate (SIPX) and diesel oil emulsion (DOE) as bulk collectors. The molybdenum facility was idled due to low market prices and high operational costs. Quadra Chemicals partnered with Chevron Phillips Chemical (referred to throughout this article as CP Chem) for lab tests and plant trials. A new collector blend was developed. SIPX and diesel oil emulsion were substituted. The molybdenum facility restarted in autumn of that year. Copper and molybdenum recoveries improved by 0.9% and 4% respectively
Mining Process Challenge
Figure 1: Simplified grinding and bulk flotation flowsheet for mineral concentrators
For bulk flotation process, chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) and molybdenite (MoS2) were the primary minerals to be recovered. Feed mineralogy varied as mining advanced to new ore zones. The bulk flotation circuit used a blend of sodium isopropyl xanthate (SIPX) and diesel oil emulsion (DOE) as bulk Cu-Mo collectors. pH over 10.5 was required to reach the target copper-molybdenum recovery goals. During this process, it was determined that lime consumption was high.
Unfortunately, the molybdenum recovery facility production was idled due to low market prices and high operational costs. The metallurgical group in place worked exceptionally hard to find a solution to improve recovery, hoping to restart molybdenum production as soon as possible. Testing alternative collectors became a top priority.
FIRST ROUND: COPPER RECOVERY IMPROVEMENT
A blend of dithiophosphate (DTP), thionocarbamate (TNC) and mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT) were added to the SIPX solution as secondary copper collectors, which increased copper recovery by 3%.
SECOND ROUND: MOLYBDENUM RECOVERY IMPROVEMENT
Quadra Chemicals partnered with CP Chem to participate in the second, third and fourth rounds of tests/trials.
CP Chem tested four (4) specialty collectors (represented by the red, black, blue and green curves in the diagram below) at both a low dosage and high dosage against the diesel oil emulsion (represented by the turquoise curve) at actual dosage:
Molybdenum Collector Results — Low Dosage
Molybdenum Collector Results — High Dosage
The collectors represented by the red and black curves outperformed the rest and thus were selected for plant trials. The red was trialed first during Q3 of that year due to lower cost and slightly better performance. Molybdenum recovery increased by 8% on average; however, the operators were concerned about the odor and requested to try the other collector solution (black curve), which was odorless. Molybdenum recovery was significantly more sensitive to grind size and feed mineralogy, resulting in a 2% increase for the first trial and 11% for the second trial. The odorless collector solution was selected by the operators to move forward as the substitute to DOE.
THIRD ROUND: OVERALL COPPER-MOLYBDENUM RECOVERY IMPROVEMENT
During Q4 of that year, following the second round of tests/trials, CP Chem tested the current blend using alternative sulfide collectors. The laboratory results showed copper-molybdenum recovery improvement with the addition of the new collector (green curve) to the current tested blend (blue curve):
Copper Recovery Results — New vs Legacy Solution
Molybdenum Recovery Results — New vs Legacy Solution
FOURTH ROUND: TAILINGS RECOVERY AND PH REDUCTION
Rougher tailings samples were tested to determine whether additional recovery was possible. Laboratory results showed that by replacing the SIPX mixture with MC17A in the secondary blend, copper-molybdenum recoveries improved by 4% and 2% respectively using the new solution.
Plant trials were performed during Q3, showing copper-molybdenum recovery improvements of 0.4% and 3%. Discrepancies between lab and trial results were due to fluctuations in grind size and feed mineralogy. pH was decreased from 10.5 to 9.8 in September, with no significant recovery losses thanks to the removal of SIPX.
Tailings Recovery Comparison by Solution
RESULTS
By the fourth quarter of that year, the specialty blend using MC17A and DTP/TNC/MTB officially replaced the SIPX/DOE mixture in production at both concentrators.
The results of the treatment are visible in these images of the tailings box from before and after the treatment using the Chevron Phillips Chemical’s application.
Tailings Box Before Custom Solution
Tailings Box Froth After Custom Solution
OPTIMIZING COPPER RECOVERY
The new concentrator’s average grind size decreased during the third and fourth quarter of that calendar year and its effect on copper recovery was analyzed:
Click above to see full size image
The scatter plot shows a noticeable copper recovery improvement at the end of July when SIPX was substituted by CP Chem’s collectors in the secondary blend, and no significant loss was observed by mid-September when the measured pH was lowered from 10.5 to 9.8.
As expected, the new collectors were sensitive to grind size, with a 0.5% increase in copper recovery per 1% decrease in +65 mesh fraction (212 µm). Comminution presented the next opportunity for improvement.
Benefits
By the fourth quarter of that year, the specialty blend using MC17A and DTP/TNC/MTB officially replaced the SIPX/DOE mixture in production at both concentrators.
The results of the treatment are visible in these images of the tailings box from before and after the treatment using the Chevron Phillips Chemical’s application.
- Improved Cu recovery by 0.9%
- Improved Mo recovery by 4%
- Eliminated SIPX (CS2 vapour)
- Reduced lime consumption (pH 10.5 to 9.8)